Because I think the Davey wanted the $_APPLICATION to be shared among multiple people's connections... Maybe I am wrong?
-Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: Justin Hannus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Proposal] Idea for Application level variables So it seems like to get the same functionality, in userland, why not just: $_APPLICATION = &$_SESSION -Justin "Davey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Wojtek Meler wrote: > > Davey wrote: > > > >> MMCache can be used as a session handler, but this still has the > >> pitfalls of the other solutions. > >> > >> If you were to implement $_APP(LICATION) as suggested, then it > >> could indeed (in theory) use MMCache, just as $_SESSION does > >> > >> - Davey > > > > > > As far as I understand you just want to have another superglobal > > variable, don't you? If so I have small patch witch allow to > > configure in php.ini names for additional superglobals. > > > > Regards, > > Wojtek > > > > Well, whilst this could work, it means that $_APP(LICATION) would not > have the same infrastrcture below it as $_SESSION does (automatic > serializing/unserializing and the ability to switch the data storage > from files, to user, to SQLite and to MMCache) > > - Davey > > P.S. > > Would mind that patch anyways, sounds good, just doesn't fulfill my > needs/desires for $_APP(LICATION) > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
