Hi Paul, wt., 28 lip 2020 o 20:56 Paul M. Jones <pmjo...@pmjones.io> napisał(a):
> ... > Let's count. + is "change away from @@ to anything else", - is "stay with > @@", ? is hard-to-tell/weak/uncertain/they-all-suck. > ... > Michal Brzuchalski: -? > Wow. Hold on your horses. I was never in favour for @@ but always against at least AFAIR. Where did you get that? Anyway it should be ++ here > > ++: 13 definitely prefer changing to something other than @@ (though not > necessarily #[]) > ++: 14 definitely prefer changing to something other than @@ (though not necessarily #[]) > +?: 10 probably prefer changing to something other than @@ (though not > necessarily #[]) > ??: 23 hard-to-tell/weak/uncertain/they-all-suck > -?: 3 probably prefer to keep @@ > -?: 2 probably prefer to keep @@ --: 4 definitely prefer to keep @@ > It's hard to rely fully on your statement considering such a mistake. Cheers, Michał Marcin Brzuchalski
