Hi Jochem,
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Jochem Maas:
> I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
> be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for seperate
> funcs?:
>
> set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_OVERRIDE); // default
> set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_APPEND);
> set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_PREPEND);
Thanks for your support, but this seems counter intuitive. Why should
*set*_include_path() be used to *append* or *prepend* to the include
path? Also learning another mouthful of constants is maybe suboptimal.
Getting used to prepend_/append_...() is easy from my point of view, as
the name is derived from what's currently present (set_include_path()).
cu, Lars
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
