On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > You can't actually use the class name "DateFormatter" when you want > > pecl/intl to be in core. "Date" is the prefix for the already existing Date > > extension. > > I think we still can name it DateFormatter, especially if we plan (and we do, > as I understand) to merge DateFormatter functions with ext/date in PHP 6, and > we don't have any conflict now and we do not have any plans to have > DateFormatter in ext/date (correct me if I'm wrong here).
You're wrong. We can rename it later *if* it gets merged into ext/date, but you can't simply use a classname with a prefix that conflicts with something else. Merging it would most likely change API anyway. > But if you have a better name for it - please propose it. Something that does not start with Date. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
