On 04.07.2009, at 21:10, Paul Biggar <paul.big...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Lukas Kahwe
Smith<m...@pooteeweet.org> wrote:
I can't see the difference between your proposal and the
conclusion I
reached yesterday?
(which was that there is a near consensus around strict checks by
default, with casts allowed with some syntax).
Well to me it Sounded like you wanted to Rely on Standard Type
juggling and
what i am proposing is more strict than that. More over i am Not
convinced
that strict should Be the Default.
I don't know what you mean by standard type-juggling. Your proposal
really does not outline what you want very much, just what you're
against. As for strictness, if your proposal suggests that strict
typing is the default, I cannot see where.
I did Not specify what doesnt Match in the RFC. I will fix that
omission on monday. I assumed it was clear that i tried to Provide
Complete examples for what will Pass. So Passung a String with
anything but 1 or 0 would Not Pass à Bool Type check.
The other Thing that i wanted to make clear is that After the weak
Type check is that a cast should Happen afterwards.
Finally i wanted to clarify my concerns about Structure typing to
ensure that the Short Syntax is a weak check and only with additional
Chars like the proposed ! Or something like that, can One get a Strict
Type check.
Regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
