On 13.04.2010 11:44, Tjerk Anne Meesters wrote: > Think it's also important to keep the IDE factor in mind. By just > defining a catch-all at the end of your function declarations you > essentially cut short any effort that could be made to have IDE code > insight support for this language enhancement.
Well, it's obviously made for those cases when you need very high amount of parameters, or just dynamically named ones, and I don't see what's the problem of doing it with a catch-all arg versus passing an array (which is what people do now), both will screw the IDEs over since accepted parameters are not statically defined. Cheers, Jordi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
