Both. I'd never read anything about that before so was kinda curious how that works given how chaotic the PHP dev process can be at times.
I think it's a solid approach but I've always been a fan of having written policies and clear procedures as opposed to the more ad hoc approach that this appears to be. I wouldn't mind seeing this drafted into an RFC; I believe the policy as you described it should remain exactly as it is but the neurotic side of me would be far less antsy if this was clearly articulated in some form of "official" policy documentation. This is part of my longstanding campaign to ruin other people's Fridays with nitpicky crap. ;P --Kris On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ahh ok that makes sense. I actually didn't realize there was an added >> "admin" layer. How was that list generated? >> >> --Kris >> >> >> > what do you mean by that? > from the technical POV? that list is maintained manually. > > from the policy POV? > usually who need access to something and he seems to be trustworthy, > he/she gets access. > on a related note: > http://phpadvent.org/2008/php-meritocracy-by-andrei-zmievski > > -- > Ferenc Kovács > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu >
