On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>> Just to play devil's advocate (Satan and I go way back), what about >>>> people who are established PHP developers but who generally don't >>>> participate in the development/discussion of PHP core? An argument could >>>> be made that, as the users of PHP, they should be able to have some say in >>>> its development. That's not my position, mind you; I'm just throwing that >>>> premise out there to see if it holds up. =) >>>> >>> >>> could you please open a separate thread for that? >>> btw. "regular participant of internals discussions" is one of the reason >>> on which group someone can get voting karma. >>> so if that is provided, anybody have a chance to get join >>> the decision making process. >>> >>> -- >>> Ferenc Kovács >>> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu >>> >> >> Why would that be a separate thread? Isn't that what we're talking >> about? I.e. determining who gets voting access and who doesn't? > > > I just ask for clarification on how the community representatives (which > is defined in the accepted voting RFC) can get their karma. > You are talking about changing the requirements for somebody to be able to > participate in the voting, thus changing/extending the original RFC. > It's the same topic, and the question of who *should* or should not be allowed to vote was already raised previously on this thread. That's what I was responding to. So, deep breath.... =) --Kris > -- > Ferenc Kovács > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu >
