Hi Zeev 2013/1/29 Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com>: > In parallel we’re in the process of prepping the source code for > independent public consumption, which I hope we can be done with by the end > of next week, hopefully sooner.
I'm sorry, but I don't see why we out of a sudden should consider adding a Zend product to the core, over that we got already, yes I'm pointing in APC's direction, although it is in PECL. I'm not trying to bring in this skepticism here because I'm, a previous APC dev, but mostly because I do not think this is the right move. Why? Because we tried to push APC from PECL into the Core since early 5.x, although I've only been around since just before 5.3a1, I remember how we were all focused on putting APC into the Core rather than a non php.net project (like XCache, eAccelerator, ...), where many of the core developers have invested much time in promoting APC, and tried to fix some of the issues it have had. Moving APC into the core was against some people's PoV because they thought it would be enabled by default, which it wouldn't be at all. I am very strongly against this move if its approved (not the actual RFC), but how an outside product suddenly deserves a spot in the core over our own code, by that I mean folks that does not work for Zend, but have contributed the code to php.net, I think that is highly controversial. -- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen ka...@php.net -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
