Hi! > Yes, this is an overhead, but it is small beer compared to doing a > getattr() RPC across the server room fabric to a NAS server backend.
That depends of what your error handlers do. Some may write to log files, etc. if not configured properly (since error_reporting setting doesn't have to be considered in it). IIRC, for most of the cases O+ should be able to resolve all includes/requires on cached files without syscalls - but file_exists is a different matter since caching it in generic case can be very dangerous. > I guess that I should bite the bullet and switch to 5.5. I've been > working on an evaluatorfork of APC optimized for CLI/GCI which tackles a > lot of these issues head on and performs reasonable well, but I realise > that this is a dead-end and will never get deployed, but I am currently > considering regressing some of this technology into 5.5 and O+. Are you > interested in a version of O+ which supports all SAPIs? I think right now O+ can support CLI (provided enable_cli is set) but for most cases it's kind of useless since scripts are rarely re-included in common CLI scenarios. So if you know how to improve common CLI scenarios it may be interesting, though I imagine it's not the most common use case. But if it adds there without problems for anything else, why not. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php