> > > > I do not think it makes sense to take the number of commits as metric. > > People's commit behaviour is different. Some commit only once after > > everything is done and others commit regularly after each achieved > > small step towards the goal. > > I belong rather to the second group. Why should I be favoured over > > another person who has only one commit in his pull request? > > > > > are you favored? > I was just pointing out a factual error about a claim in an earlier message > and how other factors can influence the number of > commits counted attributed to a person. >
Sorry, you obviously interpreted my message in a way I did not intend to bring it over. I did not intend to attack you or something. I merely wanted to point out that there are additional aspects which makes number of commits a rather fuzzy metric. If this metric were be used then people which commit more regularly would be favoured and with committing regularly I do not mean implement many features, fixing bugs etc. but just that they use the git command "commit" more often than others. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php