> >
> > I do not think it makes sense to take the number of commits as metric.
> > People's commit behaviour is different. Some commit only once after
> > everything is done and others commit regularly after each achieved
> > small step towards the goal.
> > I belong rather to the second group. Why should I be favoured over
> > another person who has only one commit in his pull request?
> >
> >
> are you favored?
> I was just pointing out a factual error about a claim in an earlier message 
> and how other factors can influence the number of
> commits counted attributed to a person.
> 

Sorry, you obviously interpreted my message in a way I did not intend to bring 
it over. I did not intend to attack you or something. I merely wanted to point 
out that there are additional aspects which makes number of commits a rather 
fuzzy metric. 
If this metric were be used then people which commit more regularly would be 
favoured and with committing regularly I do not mean implement many features, 
fixing bugs etc. but just that they use the git command "commit" more often 
than others.


--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to