2015-01-22 15:22 GMT+02:00 Arvids Godjuks <arvids.godj...@gmail.com>:
> 2015-01-21 19:21 GMT+02:00 Tony Marston <tonymars...@hotmail.com>: > >> "Kristopher" wrote in message news:CAF9U7z_BLDusnq7c0mVToxyJpqOpa+ >> tmatgqrb7yqeips11...@mail.gmail.com... >> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Tony Marston <tonymars...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> You are totally missing the point. It is the principle of having to >>>> spent >>>> unknown quantities of time in refactoring my code for nothing more than >>>> a >>>> frivolous and unnecessary break in BC. It does not fi a bug or a >>>> security >>>> issue, therefore it is frivolous and unnecessary >>>> >>>> >>>> Yet you seem to have no problem wasting loads of time arguing about it >>> on >>> the internet. >>> >> >> Because I would rather fight for valid principles than give in. To quote >> Emiliano Zapata "It is better to die on your feet than live on your knees". >> >> >> -- >> Tony Marston >> >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > By this time, you could have opened your project/projects in any Regex > search and replace capable editor/IDE, wrote a pattern that matches class > name with a method name same as class name and replaces it with > __construct. Takes about 5-10 minutes for the first project to get it > right, ensures forward compatibility since 5.0.0 and saves your employer > all those hours that you just spend arguing. > Or just write a PHP script that does the same - even easier and faster... > Omg, a folowup. I just found a gem in the docs: "As of PHP 5.3.3, methods with the same name as the last element of a namespaced class name will no longer be treated as constructor. This change doesn't affect non-namespaced classes." Can be read here: http://lv.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.decon.php So, I think this seals the deal :)
