On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Pavel Kouřil wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Derick Rethans <der...@derickrethans.nl> >> wrote: >> > >> > I've decided to re-propose the CoC RFC. There are many reasons for it, >> > but there are a few points I want to make. >> >> if you still insists on some CoC, maybe you could at least look into >> something else than the "Contributor Covenant"? >> >> For example, http://code-of-merit.org/ seems much more reasonable in >> "getting the things done" than the Covenant. > > Sure - I would very much appreciate a list of things to look at. Would > you have time to suggest a list with C of C's? It is unlikely that one > will cover it all anyway. Something that (stolen the idea from twitter) > has a good list of *positive* core values is also in my opinion > important to have. > > cheers, > Derick
Hi, unfortunately, I don't have time for that (or at least not now). :( The other thing is, I honestly don't believe you even need a CoC - and if you really DO need it, it should be as short as possible, basically something like "write code/rfcs, politely discuss it and don't discuss anything not related to project on project forums/mailing lists/etc." should be totally enough. The longer the CoC gets, the more "clutter" it will have - as you can see in the Covenant. (This is why I find the Code of Merit much better than Covenant, even though it is IMHO still too long - and the fact it doesn't have approximately 1/3 or 1/4 of the text dedicated to listing abusive behavior and the general equality stuff, like Covenant does. And that it doesn't try to control people outside of the project.) Regards PK -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
