On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 09:11:30PM -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Jefferson Ogata wrote: > > Bear in mind also that Sourceforge's availability of late has been crap. > > On the contrary - in the last 6-8 months they've *greatly* improved. > Last year I would have said steer clear, but they've been making a lot > of changes that have made a visible difference, IMO.
I've experienced availability problems recently on one sf hosted project. In March there was a CVS outage of several days. Then in May there was an outage of about a week. I am not sure if it affected all projects. > As for the project name, I hightly doubt the other IPFilter is doing to > want to give it up, but you can easily use "ipf" which is just as > recognizable, and since I assume you'll be linking to the SF page from > the IPF's homepage, it's not a huge deal either way. ipf is also taken at sourceforge. ip-filter is not taken yet. Ben
