Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > >So, I think it's time for a hum on this one (the simple > >update to 2460 that Scott and I at least seem to agree > >on). > > Hum. > > Could someone publish an internet draft with this wording? > The only draft that we have now is pretty far away from this.
Good point. What we need is a short simple draft to update 2460, independent of draft-rajahalme- . Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
