Jim Bound wrote: > with all due respect. rfc 1918 was a hack and never would pass the IESG > today IMO they are doing a far better job these days causing us to detail > our network views and development of protocols. 1918 has wrecked the > Internet.
Ripping site-locals out of the specs will not prevent folks who perceive the need for stable addresses (e.g., for internal use) from allocating them, especially given that ~7/8 of the IPv6 address space is held in reserve. Regards, =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Steven L. Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ericsson IP Infrastructure 919-472-9913 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
