Folks, Richard has stated he has implemented this and has customers. Lets here him out. I don't like them either but that means something to me anyway.
Richard ??? /jim [Have you ever seen the rain coming down on a sunny day] > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@;cs.utk.edu] > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:52 AM > To: Pekka Savola > Cc: Margaret Wasserman; Richard Draves; Keith Moore; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Node Requirements Issue 3 > > > > I believe often an issue here is that OS/application > vendors can just > > bind all the local services to nodes' site-local addresses, > and make > > the security someone else's (ie router vendor, because site locals > > must not go out of the site) problem. > > IMHO this is a really good reason for deprecating SLs entirely. > > if nothing else, we should make it very clear that it is not > acceptable > for developers/vendors to assume that the threats from the > local network > are less, or significantly different, than the threats presented by > the global Internet. > > Keith > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
