I agree Keith but just want a logic check for my own sanity. I am with you on all mail. Just want to check. I think they are far more trouble than any benefit I can see for users and I fear greatly it causing a NAT problem which is just not good.
/jim [Have you ever seen the rain coming down on a sunny day] > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@;cs.utk.edu] > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:25 PM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: Keith Moore; Pekka Savola; Margaret Wasserman; Richard > Draves; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Node Requirements Issue 3 > > > > Richard has stated he has implemented this and has customers. Lets > > here him out. > > by all means, if there are good reasons to impose this > considerable burden on applications, let's hear them. > > of course, just because there are implementations of SL and > that customers > have bought those implementations doesn't mean that > widespread use of SLs > is something that IETF should endorse. > > Keith > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
