Keith, I am not trying to attack, to the contrary I think I have simply been focused on defending a discussion settled so long ago that most of the interested parties have assumed it is done and they don't need to stay engaged. The only personal comment I am aware of was pointing out that you were asking for people to state why SL was necessary, but every time someone did you dismissed it out of hand because it didn't fit your policy of how a network should be run. That was not intended as a personal attack, so much as a wake up call to what was going on.
You have a valid argument about making developers of multi-party apps aware that scope boundaries represent a new adventure that is not well defined yet. That does not automatically translate into the condition that all uses of SL are invalid (particularly 2 party ones). So instead of trying to blanket ban or restrict use of SL, state where the known pitfalls are, and let's move on. Tony > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:moore@;cs.utk.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Limiting the Use of Site-Local > > > > That summarizes it well. > > and it appears to me that you are trying to attack me > personally rather than actually make credible arguments in > favor of using SL. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
