> if my memory serves me right we had consensus on limiting site-locals > somewhat, i.e not pushing multi-site support.
e.g. perhaps. not i.e. the question wasn't nearly that precise. (which is part of why I objected to the question being asked in that way) > we also had consensus that _working_ on non-routable global PI > addresses sounded like an interesting idea. again, I think that's a slight rephrasing. this question wasn't precise either but there was clearly widespread interest and belief that global PI addresses would relieve some of the burden on SLs. > until we see some real proposals on the table, there is nothing to > reach consensus about with regards to GUPIs. nobody is claiming consensus on any specific GUPI proposal yet - we're still trying to figure out what the issues are and the general shape of something that might fly. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
