Tony Hain wrote: > > John Bartas wrote: > > If IPv6 has a better anonymity solution, can someone > > point me to it? Or do I have to start working on NATv6? > > (See, this is why I don't always want to identify myself! > > :-) > > See RFC 3041 - It does exactly what you want without the drawbacks of > NAT.
Actually not, if you have a domestic /48 or /64 prefix. But the MobileIP solution looks OK. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
