Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
If IPv6 has a better anonymity solution, can someone point me
to it? Or do I have to start working on NATv6? (See, this is
why I don't always want to identify myself! :-)
See RFC 3041 - It does exactly what you want without the
drawbacks of NAT.
Actually not, if you have a domestic /48 or /64 prefix. But the
MobileIP solution looks OK.
Looks but doesn't act like really providing location privacy, IMHO.
I meant HMIPv6 providing location privacy is dubitable (I was not
referring to Mobile IPv6).
Alex
GBU
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
