Hi Michel, I see your point, but my feeling is that we can only go to the last step (of the IETF process) IF it make sense (running code, and then it means no-brainer), that means that B is fine, but for the same reason, I can live with C (in theory, B and C are then the same solution) ;-).
Regards, Jordi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bob Hinden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:16 PM Subject: RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing > Bob, > > > Bob Hinden wrote: > > Please respond to the list with your preference > > I would prefer C. "Rough consensus and running code". Possibly I could > live with B, but it greatly depends on how difficult the new solution is > to implement. If everyone agrees that implementing the new solution is a > no-brainer, then B would be fine. > > However, if the new solution requires significant coding that many > people don't feel too good about it, C is required. We don't want to > deprecate for a solution that looked good on paper but proved impossible > to implement and be left with zip. > > I have trouble understanding why the issues that applied to site-locals > would not apply as well to the new solution until I have seen the new > solution. > > IMHO the choice between B and C is premature until we have a clearer > view of the alternatives. > > Michel. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ***************************** Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit Presentations and videos on-line at: http://www.ipv6-es.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
