Jeroen, > Jeroen Massar wrote: > At this moment you can announce almost anything > you want apparently.
Yep I see /32 /33 /35 /40 /41 /42 /44 /48 /64 from some peers, Including some interesting ones such as: 2001:530:DEAD:BEAD::/64 This is the very reason we have to be very careful with any kind of globally unique address that has a global scope, because it can really quickly degenerate into having clueless ISPs that don't care to clueful salespersons that see an opportunity. As a few thousand prefixes would not be a problem at the beginning, it might take of really quick leaving a big mess to clean up some years later. > Fortunatly there are clued ISP's who do > filter accordingly to: > http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html NRENS do filter too for what I have seen. > As you are probably one of the many people who really > knows that we need is: Multihoming ;) How did you guess that? Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
