> Todd T. Fries wrote: > What requirement of site-local does provider > independent addressing not provide?
We do not have PI addresses for IPv6, to begin with. And the reason we don't is that as soon as you begin to think about them I can already hear screams about having to carry an individual /48 in the routing table for each home. Yes, we need a PI-like solution but is has nothing to do with site-local addresses; they are complementary not competing. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
