Thanks for the clarification. I think I misunderstood "not replace site-local addresses in any form". If I have it right, the phrase implies "explicitly do not consider any alternatives", to which I agree that accepting <draft-hinden-ipv6-global-local-addr-02.txt> indicates that the WG is interested in considering alternatives.
- Ralph
At 09:15 PM 8/4/2003 -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
Ralph,
Furthermore, based on the record of the question from the minutes of the SF meeting and the question put to the ipng mailing list, how was this conclusion arrived at:
A fourth alternative is to not replace site-local addresses in any form, but I think the working group has made it clear that this is not a reasonable alternative.
It's from my reading of the discussion (on the mailing list and in the meetings) and the fact that the working group decided to accept <draft-hinden-ipv6-global-local-addr-02.txt> as a working group document in Vienna.
Bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
