Put differently, it better be Wednesday night, since I can't be in Taipei any earlier ;-).
-geoff From: Stephen Hanna Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:09 PM To: Yoav Nir; Geoffrey Huang Cc: ipsec@ietf.org Subject: RE: [IPsec] New -00 draft: Creating Large Scale Mesh VPNs Problem I agree. Wednesday night would be best. Who else is interested in getting together to discuss this? Clearly, there are plenty of interesting issues to discuss. Steve From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yoav Nir Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 10:00 AM To: Geoffrey Huang; Stephen Hanna Cc: ipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [IPsec] New -00 draft: Creating Large Scale Mesh VPNs Problem Well, there is a free room between 1300-1500 on Wednesday, but then we're opposite WebSec, and I can't attend. Our best bet is to do it after the Plenary. The plenary ends at 19:30, and people might want to grab something to eat, so it would probably be best to do it at 20:00. Hope you don't have a flight for Wednesday night... On 10/26/11 10:19 PM, "Geoffrey Huang" <ghu...@juniper.net<mailto:ghu...@juniper.net>> wrote: I have to agree with the recent comments about the inapplicability of RFC 4322. I don't think that a DNNSEC infrastructure can be assumed, particularly not in the deployments I have seen. I agree with Steve Hanna's comments about the need for ad-hoc peer-to-peer VPNs, bypassing a centralized hub. I also agree with Paul Hoffman's comments about using an already-existing "trusted introducer." Finally, I will be in Taiwan, but specifically (only) to discuss this topic. I'm hoping that the date of Wednesday, November 16 is still good for the bar BOF that some of us had previously discussed. -geoff
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
