> >I agree with Paul H. that the term "encryption domain" is not really
> >fully correct for this problem set and its scenarios. I also apologize
> >for lurking for quite some time before chiming in. I'd also rather
avoid
> >marketing-related jargon of any given vendor.
>
> Having been working for the same vendor for 10 years, I've gotten used
to
> our marketing jargon. Anyway, I'd like to have some short term for "the
> set of addresses that are behind a certain gateway", or "the set of
> addresses that you can reach through a tunnel to gateway x". I'm used to
> calling that "x's encryption domain", but I'm open to suggestions for a
> new catchy term.
>
Some ideas:
1) "IPsec protected destinations"
2) "IPsec protection domain"
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
