Paul,
On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.i...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi, this is to start a 2-week working group last call on the revised
Algorithm Implementation Requirements
document, ending March 11. The draft is at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-ah-reqts-01. We
should have last called the draft a while ago, and I apologize for
the delay.
Section 2.2:
It lists NULL ESP as a MUST. Wasn't this a MUST a leftover from the old
crypto export restrictions? While I think NULL ESP is a good debugging
tool, and a good replacement for AH in general, I don't think this is
really a MUST item (unless you would actually advise people to migrate
from AH to ESP NULL, in which case I'll cheer on this MUST)
I think we do want folks to migrate from AH to ESP/NULL. That's why we
made support for AH a MAY a while ago.
Steve
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
