Nuts... looks like it's time for IPSwitch to immediately provide us paid
customers with a 'Major' upgrade say.. version 2.0.0 ?

Thanks Terry looks like were in for a wild ride.. hang on.. lol

~Rick

----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry L Fritts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rick Leske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:43 PM - SATCOM
Subject: Re: [IpswitchIM_Forum] Clients on private network Server on
Internet network


> Hello Rick,
>
> Wednesday, February 5, 2003 you wrote:
> RL> Is there any truth to the dual ports?  and if so do they just both use
tcp
> RL> only?
>
> Look at your log files and you'll know soon enough if you have the
> issue.
>
> Here is an example from mine:
> -------------------------
> 2/5/2003 9:07:25 AM ImServer Failed to push local presence to ...
>        Error=Failed to connect to 192.168.0.162 on port 5178
> -------------------------
>
> I opened up 5178 outgoing from the IM server, 5177 incoming on my
> workstation, set the Nat flag and it started working.  TCP only.
>
> You don't need the nat flag on a workstation that connects directly to
> the im server without natting but I guess that's obvious.
>
> Most of our clients have firewalls though and most nat so the nat
> setting is a problem on install.
>
> Terry Fritts
> Smart Business Solutions, Inc.

___________________________________________________________________
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/IpswitchIM_Forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/Instant_Messenger/index.asp

Reply via email to