On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Pekka Savola wrote: > - put it in RFC3306 address, like FF32:40:fe80:<stuff>:<group-id> or > FF32:A:fe80:<stuff>:<group-id>. > this would leave 64 bits space to generate an address, assuming the > group-id is 32. > - the 64 bits (<stuff>) could be the interface ID of the link-local > address, or something else completely, like a random number.
oops.. a miscalculation; this would leave (about) 48 bits for "stuff" rather than 64.. assuming the group-id would be 32, which it wouldn't need to be. regardless of that, the point seems valid: there seem to be little need for this spec. of course, the simplest way would be use the about 48 bits or 80 bits to randomly generate an address. The collision probability is insignificant. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
