> Hi, Pekka. > > >>>Pekka Savola wrote: > >> > First, there is no guarantee of uniqueness in the first place, as > >> > DAD on the IPv6 link-local unicast address was performed on the > >> > address, not the Interface-ID. In practice, the > collisions should be > very rare, though.
My understanding is that there will be no problem, because the spec says the interface-ID must be taken from the link-local address (IEEE-64 based interface ID) > >Pekka Savola wrote: > >If an SSM implementation checks for FF3x::/32 (as described > in RFC 3306 > section 6), > >and not for FF3x::/96 (as described in RFC 3306 section 7), > but will not > implement this specification, > >there will be lots of trouble. > I think all SSM multicast addresses must have the format FF3x::/96, according to ["network prefix = 0" of RFC 3306] hence there will be no trouble. Daniel -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
