As we recycle 2461 and 2462 specifications I suggest that no additional names be added to the authors names for two reasons. First its not "honorable" as nothing has been discussed nor I perceive currently will be learned that adds any architectural value of "significance" to these widely deployed and important IPv6 specifications. The current authors worked for many years and earned their names on this spec. Second I believe new editors should be put at the bottom of the spec under recycle acknowledgements per the IETF new rule to reduce author names on all specifications.
My .50 cents, /jim --------------------------------------------------------- "You want to spread rumors and gossip about me? You want to question my honor and integrity? You want to insult me to my face? Okay...go right ahead. But, don't expect me to walk away. Don't expect me to take it. Hell, don't expect me to hire a lawyer to do my fighting for me. Some people are inherently peaceful. They're capable of swallowing their anger or letting the legal system take its course. Maybe they believe in some sort of Judgement Day, when we all have to account for our transgressions. Me? I am not that patient." Chuck Zito from "Street Justice" -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
