On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:21:43AM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote: > > - the addresses proposed in draft-hinden appear to be strictly better > than either the existing site-local or hijacked addresses. They can be > filtered in routers. Attempts at uniqueness give us a reasonable hope of > tracing the source of leaks. They don't conflict with existing > addresses, so the leaks don't affect the connectivity or the traffic > load of third parties. > > In short, the proposed addresses cannot eliminate application level > leaks, but they can definitely reduce their consequences, and do a much > better job at that than the alternatives.
I think this is a good summary and a good reason to move forward with the draft-hinden proposal as a best compromise (since no solution is perfect). Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
