On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:12:58PM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote: > > In the case in point, there is a significant constituency who believes > that they need a replacement for site local addresses, and that > "draft-hinden" is a reasonable way to obtain this replacement. You are > indeed free to not use such addresses and never deploy them within the > networks that you manage, but that does not change the needs of others.
Agree 100%. IPv6 at least has the advantage that we have address space to offer anyone wanting local addressing a means to gain a unique (or as good as a unique) prefix to use, which is a big advantage on the (dis)ambiguity front. Leakage will still be an issue, but I don't believe that can be fixed by an RFC. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
