Thank you! I was trying to get to the same point, but your summary is much better!

And no, I absolutely do not think we should try and wait for routable PI space, which seems to be the only other suggestion made on this list.

--On Tuesday, November 04, 2003 09:21 -0800 Christian Huitema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

- the addresses proposed in draft-hinden appear to be strictly better
than either the existing site-local or hijacked addresses. They can be
filtered in routers. Attempts at uniqueness give us a reasonable hope of
tracing the source of leaks. They don't conflict with existing
addresses, so the leaks don't affect the connectivity or the traffic
load of third parties.

In short, the proposed addresses cannot eliminate application level
leaks, but they can definitely reduce their consequences, and do a much
better job at that than the alternatives.




Hans Kruse, Associate Professor J. Warren McClure School of Communication Systems Management Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701 740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to