Keith Moore wrote: > > > I've chewed on this for quite a while, and I think some derivative > > of "private" would be good but a suggestion we heard earlier is > > even better. I recall seeing some time back the suggestion of > > "Organizational Addresses", and I think this fits best of all. > > that's completely ridiculous. these addresses are not specific to an > organization at all.
Then to what are they specific? Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
