Hi,
how about "private scope addresses"? or when all else fails, draw
the name out of a hat one word at a time ;o)
br,
George
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Keith Moore wrote:
> >
> > > I've chewed on this for quite a while, and I think some derivative
> > > of "private" would be good but a suggestion we heard earlier is
> > > even better. I recall seeing some time back the suggestion of
> > > "Organizational Addresses", and I think this fits best of all.
> >
> > that's completely ridiculous. these addresses are not specific to an
> > organization at all.
>
> Then to what are they specific?
>
> Brian
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
