Alain Durand wrote: >While doing those edits, why not also remove the dictate to give >permanent allocations from this document? >After all, this is also an operational/business discussion, not a >technical one.
It looks pretty technical to me. Permanent versus temporary allocation fundamentally affects the ways the prefix can be used. This is quite unlike the issue of the allocation procedure. By the way, do you see any redeeming features in the idea of temporary allocation of these prefixes? I see only greater complexity and reduced utility. -zefram -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
