> The problem is that with the same trouble it takes to fully delegate a > /64, the ISP could do a /48 as well. That is a good thing also, of > course. My worry is that the ISPs end up doing nothing unless they > have simple enough means available.
My worry is that ISPs would end up doing nothing because of the existance of nd proxy. Hence I conclude we should make prefix delegation work and make the implementations of it as easy as possible to use. Then the ISP can decide whether to delegate nothing (and customer gets a single address) or delegate /64, /48. > I mean, the message could also be "just give every customer a > delegated /48. If that is not possible, advertising a /64 on the link > is better than nothing." Yes, but that requires a non-robust against loops nd-proxy complexity to be added to the architecture. In the big picture this is a distraction and not a help. Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
