Stephen Sprunk wrote: > > Thus spake "Brian Haberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > > This would appear to be incompatible with the IANA considerations > > > section that says: > > > > > >> If deemed > > >> appropriate, the authority may also consist of multiple > organizations > > >> performing the authority duties. > > How about: > > IANA MAY delegate assignment capabilities to more than one entity. If this > occurs, the various entities must assign addresses using a method that is > indistinguishable from that of a single entity. Specifically, the method > MUST prevent collisions between assignments by different entities and MUST > NOT rely on subdividing the assignable address space in a manner that > promotes or resembles any aggregation scheme.
I don't think we need to say this. The simple fix s/source/authority/ in the earlier text puts the whole matter in IANA's hands, where it belongs. For the record, I agree with all Brian H's proposals except for the DNS bit that needs to be fixed. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
