I want to state that I personally do not like the new idea from the draft to consider total lifetimes of a temporary address in case of some RAs renew prefixes. (Previously lifetimes of temporary addresses could only be lowered by RAs). This adds additional complexity for the rather rare event of a sites address renumbering. Best regards Peter
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
