On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:17:22AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > I wish we had spotted this problem (and the problem in URLs > caused by : ) much earlier... but if we don't change it now, we > *never* will, which is why I asked the question. The cost of > the change is high now, but will be unthinkable once v6 is > in general use. > > I'm not convinced we should change it, but now is the time to decide.
So what would the cost be of allowing the new syntax, while not removing the old? Then at least the capability is there to avoid the % when needed. As and when people hit the problem, they start using the newer syntax. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
