We wanted the working group to review the proposed changes before a new version was submitted.
I see no big problem with the changes, but the bullet point one of the changes refers to was this:
The default behavior of exterior routing protocol sessions between administrative routing regions must be to ignore receipt of and not advertise prefixes in the FC00::/7 block. A network operator may specifically configure prefixes longer than FC00::/7 for inter-site communication.
If BGP is being used at the site border with an ISP, the default BGP configuration must filter out any Local IPv6 address prefixes, both incoming and outgoing.
This was discussed (without a resolution) in November: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg03898.html
This 'default behaviour must be to ignore' seems rather inpractical to implement from vendor's perspective (unless you create a special knob 'allow-ula' applicable to eBGP). Therefore I'm doubtful whether it gets implemented..
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
