>>>>> On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:43:07 +0200, >>>>> Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> These implementations are: KAME DHCP6, the unnamed Linux fork of the > KAME implementation at http://dhcpv6.sourceforge.net/ and the Cisco > IOS implemenation. > Conclusion: the Cisco implementation is incomplete (no address > assignment) and the other two are too immature to be of much use. > I'm impressed with the prefix delegation functionality, but as > before, the prospect of running such a complex protocol just to > optain a domain search list and some DNS resolvers makes me very > uncomfortable. A quick check (which may not be relevant to this thread): what exactly do you mean by such a complex protocol? Whole RFC3315 (mainly for address allocation), the RFC3736 subset, or both? If your goal is to obtain a domain search list and recursive name (DNS) servers, you only need the RFC3736 subset, and at least I'd not use the strong phrase "such a complex protocol" for RFC3736. Implementation maturity is a separate issue. I admit KAME's DHCPv6 implementation is not so matured yet, particularly regarding its address allocation functionality. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
