On 23 Jun 2005, at 15:03, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Wouldn't an update to a policy table be enough to resolve the problem?
It's more than one update, I think:
If the candidate destination address is from a fc00::/7 prefix
in the set that are either local to this network or a prefix at a
network with whom I have routing agreements, then prefer a local ULA
source address; otherwise if the candidate destination address is
from any other fc00::/7 prefix, never prefer our ULA source address
Perhaps the second clause is not necessary where the first rules bump
local ULAs up the preferred source address list (one rule per
routable fc00::/7 prefix)
I can see a straw poll of 3484 implementations on the horizon...
Mark/
--
Dr Mark K. Thompson
Electronics and Computer Science
a School of the University of Southampton, UK
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
