> If the text has little relevance, then I don't see why it needs to change.

The current text in (RFC3041(bis), Section 2.4, paragraph 1) is inaccurate as
discussed earlier in this thread.

Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to