>>>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:13:17 -0400, >>>>> Ralph Droms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm sorry for introducing other recommendations into your thread. I > forwarded comments from a private exchange about the draft. I'll separate > the other recommendations out into a different thread. > I don't have a strong opinion about your text, either and perhaps brevity is > a virtue. How about: > One way to avoid having a static non-changing address is to use > DHCPv6 [DHCPV6] for obtaining addresses. Section 12 of RFC 3315 > discusses the use of DHCPv6 for the assignment and management > of "temporary addresses", which are never renewed and provide the same > property of temporary addresses described in this document with regards > to the privacy concern. I'm fine with this text. We might want to replace "RFC 3315" with [DHCPV6] for consistency though. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------