Since I have not heard any objections to Bob's mail after a week, I
assume that the WG is fine with the change. I will replace the first
paragraph of section 2.4 with the following text
One way to avoid having a static non-changing address is to use
DHCPv6 [DHCPV6] for obtaining addresses. Section 12 of [DHCPV6]
discusses the use of DHCPv6 for the assignment and management
of "temporary addresses", which are never renewed and provide the
same property of temporary addresses described in this document with
regards to the privacy concern.
Cheers
Suresh
Bob Hinden wrote:
Pekka,
On Aug 31, 2006, at 6:18 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Ralph Droms wrote:
Suresh - I think Jinmei-san and I have come to agreement on
replacement text
in section 2.4 (see below).
As a WG participant, if we want to go ahead with the change, I'd
expect WG chairs to issue a last call of some sort for the changes
(giving a good motivation for the change), given that the document has
already left the WG quite a while ago.
The chairs believe these changes are editorial in nature and don't
require another working group last call.
That said, if anyone has any objections to the proposed changes please
speak up.
Bob Hinden / Brian Haberman
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
