On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Jeroen Massar wrote:
What is the point of that? How can a ULA address reach a global unicast
address or for that matter, how is such a ULA address, which is most likely
going to be the sole user of those reverse servers going to contact any of
the root servers, .arpa servers, RIR servers etc to actually find out where
that server is located in the first place?
Are those people going to do NAT from their ULA space? Then please directly
kill this whole ULA proposal completely. If NAT is involved in anyway it
should never see daylight.
I do not know the intended deployment scenarios, but in many cases
where I'd expect ULA-C migth be deployed, I'd expect such sites to
have some global addresses as well for v4, v6 or both (maybe at a
different physical site, just for a couple of infrastructure servers
instead of all hosts, etc.)
You're right that if a ULA(-C) site would have no global addresses
whatsoever, reverse-DNS delegations can't be done.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
